Friday, 15 January 2016

Trek 1.2

http://ift.tt/1PfvzMk

We so often expect the finest from Trek, and more than a few BikeRadar staff personally own bikes from the American brand. Sadly, the 1.2 just left us wanting more when we rode it back-to-back with its latest direct competitors as part of our best entry-level 2016 road bikes shootout.

Looking on the bright side, there are very few bad bikes when looking at the biggest and most trusted brands. And the 1.2 isn’t a bad bike by any stretch of the imagination, but it does need a few small component upgrades in order to showcase its true potential.

Related: Best entry-level road bikes: US/Aus / UK

ADVERTISEMENT
advertisement

Balanced and reactive ride, some nerve-wracking kit choices

The 1.2 places the rider in an easy and upright riding position

Featuring Trek’s well-respected ‘H2’ geometry, the 1.2 offers a comfortable ride position for the recreational cyclist. With this, the front-end height of the 1.2 allows for a reasonably upright position, without compromising the descending composure of the bike.

Unflashy but competent frame

Conclusion: greatness awaits, but at a price

You can read more at BikeRadar.com



via BikeRadar All the latest from BikeRadar.com http://ift.tt/1PfvzMv

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...